OCTOBER 2008 PUBLICATION 1876
http://recenter.tamu.edu/pdf/1876.pdf
Housing Markets
Texas Floats While Nation Flails
By James P. Gaines
Foreclosure
Forecast
The downturn in the capital
and mortgage markets has
been far more severe than
originally anticipated. Already
several major financial
organizations — Countrywide,
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac,
Bear Stearns and Lehman
Brothers — have failed and
required substantial federal
support. Others teeter
dangerously close to the brink.
N
ationally, the culprits behind high foreclosure numbersare the widespread decline in residential property
values from peak levels in 2005–06, the volume
of high-risk home mortgages originated and the worthless
mortgage-backed securities that fueled the boom. Without
question, the home price bubble has burst. The mortgage
delinquency and foreclosure issues have carried over into the
consumer and business credit lines, adding to the mounting
capital market financial pressures.
How Has Texas Done?
So far, Texas’ housing markets have fared comparatively well
despite all the turmoil, but the state’s housing sector increasingly
reflects the effects of the general downturn.
The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO)
reported 22 states had lower home prices in second quarter
2008 compared with first quarter 2007. Other data (the First
American Home Price Index) suggest that as many as 33 states
suffered declining home prices in the second quarter. Falling
home prices appear to be concentrated in major metropolitan
areas (according to the Case-Schiller Index, for one).
Many small and medium-sized metro areas around the
country are still reporting increasing values. So far, Texas is
one of the major states still posting home price increases. Falling
home prices mean delinquent owners and borrowers lose
Percent of Foreclosures Started
by Type of Loan, 1Q2008
Type of Loan
Percent of
Outstanding Loans
Percent of
Foreclosures Started
Prime Fixed 64% 19%
Prime ARM 14% 23%
Subprime Fixed 6% 11%
Subprime ARM 6% 37%
FHA & VA 10% 8%
Source: Mortgage Bankers Association, National Delinquency Survey, March 31,
2008. Estimates by Real Estate Center at Texas A&M University
Source: NAR, OFHEO Y/Y percent change in quarterly estimates.
20
15
10
5
0
–5
–10
Figure 1. U.S. Home Price Change
1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
Year
Percent
OFHEO Report
Sales Index
NAR Median
Price
Texas
United States
Source: RealtyTrac Inc. (Data include notices of trustee sales plus notice of
foreclosure sales.)
100
80
60
40
20
0
Figure 2. Monthly Foreclosure Fillings
June
2005
July
2006
July
2007
January
2006
January
2007
January
2008
June
2008
Thousands
Texas foreclosures have been moderate
compared to the U.S. trend.
U.S. foreclosures are up 27% YTD 2008;
Texas is down 18% YTD 2008.
the option of refinancing or renegotiating a loan or selling a
property. When properties are “upside down” (the loan amount
exceeds the current value of the property), homeowners get
discouraged and are less likely to keep up their payments,
and lenders have less room to negotiate without sustaining a
significant loss.
The significant drop in home prices that began in 2006 is
depicted in Figure 1. Both OFHEO’s repeat-sales index and the
The current housing market bust is affecting every locale
but appears to be concentrated in several states that experienced
the most rapid price increases. The boom saw housing
prices deviate way out of line with basic market fundamentals
including income, employment, buyer credit histories and
prudent lending practices. In today’s sophisticated, computerconnected
markets no place is immune to the repercussions of
national and even international financial conditions as these
directly affect the cost and availability of credit down to local
levels.
These problems have resulted in solvency questions and
strained liquidity in the banking and capital market sector.
The capital market has lost confidence in bond underwriting
practices. As a result, investors have been forced to reevaluate
risk for all securities previously purchased, which makes
determining the current price of existing bonds and securities
difficult if not impossible. This mess will probably result in
broader government regulatory controls and expanded laws
concerning mortgage lending and origination underwriting, not
to mention commercial banking and Wall Street.
Source: Mortgage Bankers Association,
National Delinquency Survey3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 3. Mortgages in Foreclosure
United States and Texas
1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2Q2008
Texas
United States
Percent
Year
2.75
1.44
median home price reported
by the National Association
of Realtors (NAR) indicate a
substantial and declining rate
of change, which is bad news
for the market.
Texas Foreclosures
Stable
S
ome leading economic analysts estimate that more than10 percent of all homeowners in the United States have
negative equity in their homes and predict that percentage
will increase as prices continue to fall. The major areas
affected by lower home prices are six states: California, Florida,
Nevada, Arizona, Ohio and Michigan. Through first half 2008,
these states accounted for 43 percent of all foreclosures in the
country according to RealtyTrac Inc.
Nationally, the number of foreclosures continues to climb,
but may begin to stabilize in second half 2008 and into 2009.
However, no significant decline in overall foreclosures should
be expected until late 2009 or early 2010 as the number of
adjustable rate mortgage (ARM) resets for both prime and
subprime mortgages will not significantly abate until second
quarter 2009. Texas foreclosures have held fairly stable,
compared with a national
increase of 61 percent to 1.4
million. Based on Notice of
Trustee Sales and Notice
of Foreclosure Sales, Texas
properties posted for foreclosure
during the first half of
2008 totaled 42,705, down
17.7 percent from the same
period in 2007. Foreclosure postings were up 27.3 percent to
462,418 nationally.
The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA)
National DelinquencySurvey
data reveal that adjustable rate mortgagesaccount for the majority of foreclosures. Prime and subprime
ARM mortgages represent approximately 20 percent of all
mortgages outstanding, and 60 percent of all foreclosures
started during first quarter 2008 (see Table).
Rate Exceeds ’80s Oil Bust
ARM loans plus subprime fixed-rate mortgages account for
26 percent of all mortgages outstanding and 71 percent of all
foreclosures. Clearly, the foreclosure issues facing the country
and Texas will not abate until the majority of ARM mortgages
originated between 2005 and 2007 reset, refinance or are foreclosed.
Most subprime loans were one- or two-year ARMs,
so the vast majority will reset in 2008 and early 2009. Prime
ARM mortgages involved one-, two-, three- and five-year
adjustments and may take well into 2010 before the majority
reset.
The MBA data further reveal the national mortgageforeclosure rate is at an all-time high, even exceeding
the Texas foreclosure rate during the oil bust and
depression of the 1980s. Texas’ current foreclosure rate is a
full percentage point less than the national rate and considerably
below the state’s mid-1980s level (Figure 3).
Nearly 2.5 percent of all mortgage loans in the United
States are in foreclosure, compared with 1.45 percent of
Texas mortgages. The foreclosure rate for subprime mortgages
nationally is 11.8 percent compared to Texas’ 5.9
percent (Figures 4 and 5).
It is hardly surprising that subprime loans have a substantially
higher foreclosure rate because they are high-risk
mortgages, a fact that seems to have been ignored by many
investors in subprime mortgage-backed securities. The most
troublesome data depicted in Figures 4 and 5 is the level of
prime loan foreclosures, which is running more than double
the long-term average rate for the nation (1.42 percent vs. 0.5
percent). Texas’ prime loan foreclosure rate is about 20 percent
above its long-term average (0.65 percent vs. 0.5 percent).
Source: Mortgage Bankers Association,
National Delinquency Survey12
11
10
9876543210
Figure 4. U.S. Mortgages in Foreclosure
by Type of Mortgage
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2Q2008
Percent
Year
Subprime Loans
All Loans
Prime Loans
11.81
2.75
1.42
slightly declining for the past several years and are expected to
continue that general trend (Figure 2).
In 2007, Texas was one of only six states that reported a
decrease (4.6 percent) in delinquency-foreclosure filings versus
a 75 percent national increase, according to RealtyTrac. During
first half 2008, Texas’ filings totaled 70,180, up 1 percent,
THE TAKEAWAY
So far, Texas has avoided high foreclosure levels. The housing
market continues relatively strong though sales and
new construction are down considerably from 2006–07. A
stronger-than-national-average economy with fairly low unemployment
and continued population growth continues to
fuel demand for housing, but not at the unsustainable levels
of the boom years.
Following Economic Ups, Downs
A common thread in these figures is that foreclosure activity
tends to be cyclical, following the ups and downs of the general
economy. Nationally, foreclosures for all loans declined during
the late 1990s and accelerated during and just after the 2001 recession.
Because that recession was quite mild, the impact on
foreclosures was not as pronounced, though the rate increased
nearly 50 percent, rising from 1.03 in second quarter 2000 to a
high of 1.51 percent in first quarter 2002.
Subprime-mortgage foreclosures,
although not nearly
as numerous as they would
later become, soared from 5.5
percent to 9.2 percent (a 68
percent increase) during the
same time. Interestingly, and
subsequently disastrously,
subprime-backed securities
investors failed to notice how
much more magnified subprime
foreclosures became
during even a slight economic
decline.
The pattern of change in
Texas foreclosure rates followed
the national pattern,
although the 2001 national
recession did not affect Texas
until 2002. Nevertheless, Texas’ prime-mortgage foreclosure
rate trended upward in late 2002 and into 2003 but not to an
alarming level.
The subprime-mortgage foreclosure rate during the time
spiked at a little over 7 percent in fourth quarter 2002. During
the housing boom in Texas, which was somewhat shorter
than nationally, both foreclosure rates dipped to near “normal”
levels or below.
Since second quarter 2006, foreclosure rates have increased,
though not nearly as much as the national rates. The primemortgage
foreclosure rate is up 44 percent from 0.43 percent to
0.65 percent, and the subprime-mortgage foreclosure rate rose
54 percent from 3.81 percent to 5.89 percent.
3.4 Million Home Mortgages Statewide
According to the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community
Survey, of Texas’ roughly 5.3 million owner-occupied
homes, approximately 3.4 million (64 percent) have a mortgage
and 1.9 million have no debt (36 percent). Of the homes with a
mortgage, about three million (89 percent) have a first loan and
Source: Mortgage Bankers Association,
National Delinquency Survey8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Figure 5. Texas Mortgages in Foreclosure
by Type of Mortgage
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2Q2008
Percent
Year
5.88
1.44
0.65
Subprime Loans
All Loans
Prime Loans
slightly more than 400,000 homes (11 percent) have some type
of second financing. Approximately 173,300 Texas homes (5
percent) have a second mortgage, nearly 200,000 (6 percent) have
a home equity loan and about 11,500 (0.3 percent) have both.
Home debt financing nationally exceeds Texas levels, with
slightly more than 68 percent of all owner-occupied homes
having some type of debt. Of the homes with debt, 73.5 percent
have only a first loan and 26.5 percent have some type of secondary
financing. Almost ten million homes nationally carry
a home equity loan or home
equity line of credit (HELOC),
representing more than 19
percent of all homes with a
mortgage. Secondary financing
is most common in the highest
home-price states where
buyers are forced to obtain
greater financing to cover the
higher acquisition costs.
Little delinquency-foreclosure
data are available on
second loans or home equity
loans. First American’s
subsidiary company, LoanPerformance,
publishes regular
reports on delinquencies and
foreclosures for loans held in
its sizeable portfolio. According
to its data as of June 2008, the states with the most significant
home equity and HELOC serious delinquencies were
Florida, Nevada and Mississippi. Texas ranked as the third-best
state with a 0.67 percent serious delinquency rate.
Texas should continue to weather the current storm well so
long as there is not a major falloff in statewide employment
and the liquidity problems plaguing mortgage lenders do not
result in a major cutoff of funding.
Dr. Gaines (
jpgaines@tamu.edu) is a research economist with the RealEstate Center at Texas A&M University.
MAYS BUSINESS SCHOOL
Texas A&M University
2115 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-2115
http://recenter.tamu.edu
979-845-2031
Director,
Gary W. Maler; Chief Economist, Dr. Mark G. Dotzour; Communications Director, David S. Jones; Managing Editor, Nancy McQuistion; Associate Editor,Bryan Pope;
Assistant Editor, Kammy Baumann; Art Director, Robert P. Beals II; Graphic Designer, JP Beato III; Circulation Manager, Mark Baumann; Typography,Real Estate Center.
Advisory Committee
D. Marc McDougal, Lubbock, chairman; Ronald C. Wakefield, San Antonio, vice chairman; James Michael Boyd, Houston; Catarina Gonzales Cron, Houston;
David E. Dalzell, Abilene; Tom H. Gann, Lufkin; Jacquelyn K. Hawkins, Austin; Barbara A. Russell, Denton; Douglas A. Schwartz, El Paso;
and John D. Eckstrum, Conroe, ex-officio representing the Texas Real Estate Commission.
Tierra Grande
(ISSN 1070-0234) is published quarterly by the Real Estate Center at Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2115. Subscriptionsare free to Texas real estate licensees. Other subscribers, $20 per year. Views expressed are those of the authors and do not imply endorsement by the
Real Estate Center, Mays Business School or Texas A&M University. The Texas A&M University System serves people of all ages, regardless of
socioeconomic level, race, color, sex, religion, disability or national origin. Photography/Illustrations: Bob Beals II, p. 1.